Two possible explanations for all the zombie books

Holy shit became the slogan of the day at HBAS after Julie Strauss-Gabel used it to describe her initial reaction to reading the ms. of Andrew Smith’s Grasshopper Jungle (winner of the BGHB award for fiction). Her point was that this was the reaction an editor should have in making a decision to acquire a […]

The post Two possible explanations for all the zombie books appeared first on The Horn Book.

17 HBAS14 publishingpanel21 Two possible explanations for all the zombie books

Ginee Seo hoping someone passes her the popcorn

Holy shit became the slogan of the day at HBAS after Julie Strauss-Gabel used it to describe her initial reaction to reading the ms. of Andrew Smith’s Grasshopper Jungle (winner of the BGHB award for fiction). Her point was that this was the reaction an editor should have in making a decision to acquire a manuscript. Other speakers picked it up to the general approval (and occasional wincing) of the audience.

It has a ring. But as  thrilling as it might be to imagine a publishing world made up of the results of such epiphanies, I don’t know if that is actually such a good idea. But when I wondered aloud how much it even actually happened, and that some books seem to be published by way of calculation rather than inspiration, Arthur Levine got all up in my grill and accused me of being cynical. He insisted that even the kind of books that I was dismissing as “copycats” were published because an editor had been excited by what he or she read.

I say, then we need smarter editors. What say you?

(Poor Arthur, though. Earlier in the day he–and I–had to listen to a librarian’s daffy explanation–based on something someone told her–that Jews get books published because other Jews, richer ones, subsidize the costs via donations made to the publisher. ‘Like an art patron!” brightly added another librarian.)

The post Two possible explanations for all the zombie books appeared first on The Horn Book.

Be the first reader to comment.

Comment Policy:
  • Be respectful, and do not attack the author, people mentioned in the article, or other commenters. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  • Don't use obscene, profane, or vulgar language.
  • Stay on point. Comments that stray from the topic at hand may be deleted.
  • Comments may be republished in print, online, or other forms of media.
  • If you see something objectionable, please let us know. Once a comment has been flagged, a staff member will investigate.


RELATED 

ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER?

We are currently offering this content for free. Sign up now to activate your personal profile, where you can save articles for future viewing

ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER?