
iStock/Thinkstock image
One can make the argument that the antonyms for moderation are “all” or “nothing.” Having nothing of something automatically makes us crave it, whether that something is potato chips, a banned book if you’re a tween, or, in the case of parents, allowing screen time for babies and toddlers when all you really want is to have a free moment to pee, dammit. In 2011, when the American Academy of Pediatrics first launched media recommendations for children under the age of two, the first generation iPad did not exist, nor did the plethora of early learning apps that now routinely hit the market. Yet AAP’s first generation of media recommendations instructed parents to not only limit screen interactions to two hours a day for children two and older, they recommended zero screen time for the birth to 24-month-old set. Zero is a lonely word. Zero does not understand a teen mother who is overwhelmed and needs a mental health break from her 16-month-old and hands her iPhone over to the tot in an effort to gain a few minutes of quiet time. Zero makes one feel guilty, or ineffective. For library practitioners of early literacy programs who may want to end our Mother Goose program by handing out iPads with the Mother Goose on the Loose app pre-loaded for parent/child interactions, zero presents a bit of a problem. It also suggests something “wrong” or negative when we allow young children to view an episode of Sesame Street with an older sibling. In a reversal and acknowledgement that “scientific research and policy statements lag behind the pace of digital innovation,” as noted in an article on the AAP site, "Beyond ‘turn it off’: How to advise families on media use," AAP released newly revised media recommendations in September that acknowledge the basic principle of moderation. Back in May, AAP held a media research symposium, Growing Up Digital, in Rosemont, IL, that largely helped shape the shift in policy guidelines. The key messages taken away from the symposium were, “family participation with media facilitates social interactions and learning. Parents should play a video game with their kids, and always co-view with infants and toddlers,” according to the article. AAP has also softened its tone to offer a compromise in this new world that the youngest millennials are inheriting. Screens are everywhere now—with no end in sight. In an October 20 press release responding to the new guidelines, Andrew Medlar, president of the Association for Library Services for Children (ALSC), stated, “ALSC strongly encourages families to visit their public library and take time to talk with youth services staff about their digital media usage and literacy needs. Developing a relationship with local library staff leads families to rich experiences and customized, informed decisions on digital media use, a sounder option than relying on one-size-fits-all online recommendation tools.” So how can libraries adapt to this new message of balance? Key messages from the revised guidelines that are relevant to early learning in libraries include: · Role modeling is critical. Librarians can use media in early learning settings to model appropriate use for parents and caregivers. · We learn from each other. Brain research shows that very young children learn best via two-way communication. Adopting the Public Library Association (PLA) and ALSC’s Every Child Ready to Read best practices of Talking, Singing, Reading, Playing, and Writing into early learning programs at the library helps model for caregivers that “talk time” between caregiver and child is necessary for language development—and that screen interactions should be active, not passive, viewing.We are currently offering this content for free. Sign up now to activate your personal profile, where you can save articles for future viewing
Add Comment :-
Be the first reader to comment.
Comment Policy:
Comment should not be empty !!!