Round Two: Endangered v Stars

The second match of round two: Endangered v. The Fault in the Stars, judged by Martine Leavitt. My prediction: I had predicted this match up, and my guess was “The Fault in Our Stars, because, well, John Green.” One thing I liked about Leavitt’s opinion: she talked about both books and not just “what I [...]

The second match of round two: Endangered v. The Fault in the Stars, judged by Martine Leavitt.

2 2 Endanger Fault Round Two: Endangered v Stars

My prediction: I had predicted this match up, and my guess was “The Fault in Our Stars, because, well, John Green.”

One thing I liked about Leavitt’s opinion: she talked about both books and not just “what I loved more” but touched on flaws. Now, I don’t necessarily agree with Leavitt but that is fine, because I just liked that she didn’t think each book was perfect. Leavitt calls it being “picky” but why not be picky about books?

And the winner? “So the winner is John Green’s The Fault in Our Stars. I like my choice. I hope you do, too.”

The loss of my dear Code Name Verity is a bit easier to take, knowing I was right about The Fault in Our Stars.

Be the first reader to comment.

Comment Policy:
  • Be respectful, and do not attack the author, people mentioned in the article, or other commenters. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  • Don't use obscene, profane, or vulgar language.
  • Stay on point. Comments that stray from the topic at hand may be deleted.
  • Comments may be republished in print, online, or other forms of media.
  • If you see something objectionable, please let us know. Once a comment has been flagged, a staff member will investigate.


RELATED 

ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER?

We are currently offering this content for free. Sign up now to activate your personal profile, where you can save articles for future viewing

ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER?