We’ve already discussed P.S. BE ELEVEN and AL CAPONE DOES MY HOMEWORK, but there is also a further trio of Newbery sequels to consider this year: HATTIE EVER AFTER, THE LORD OF OPIUM, and FROM NORVELT TO NOWHERE.

I never read HATTIE BIG SKY because it didn’t have much buzz going into the YMAs and I was taking a bit of a breather between my Newbery and Printz years, so I’m afraid I’m not going to be much help here since I haven’t read this one either.  I’m going to lean on the reviews, and let your comments determine whether this one merits more serious consideration.  Horn Book: “Larson’s excellent research makes the early twentieth century come alive: Hattie experiences an earthquake, flies in an airplane, and interviews President Woodrow Wilson in a broken elevator. Hattie’s transformation from a naive, timid “country mouse” to a confident, independent young woman makes the story’s ending — in which she discovers where (and with whom) home really is — all the more gratifying.”  Kirkus: “Larson’s prodigious research allows her to accurately recreate San Francisco between 1915 and 1920, and the city will come alive for readers as much as it does for Hattie, with crowds of people, clanging streetcar bells, the smells of China Town and 10-story-high skyscrapers. Readers will fall for this earnest, wide-eyed and strong-minded young woman who does indeed become a reporter at the San Francisco Chronicle, covering baseball, an airplane excursion and an earthquake and even interviewing President Woodrow Wilson.”

THE HOUSE OF THE SCORPION was all the rage when it was published ten years ago, winning the National Book Award, a Newbery Honor, and a Printz Honor.  THE LORD OF OPIUM is very good in its own right, but I’m also not surprised that it isn’t getting more buzz; we all have dystopia ennui.  Since I quoted reviews for HATTIE BIG SKY, I’ll include my own assessment in the Horn Book: “Farmer introduces some vivid new characters to her already colorful cast, enlarges the scope of her world-building, and eschews the quest plot that characterizes most of her work for a more nuanced one of mystery and intrigue. Yet ethical dilemmas remain at the heart of this novel, and, if anything, become elevated because of Matt’s newfound power and responsibility. “Where did it all end? How much wickedness could you do in the service of good before it turned into pure evil?”

We never gave DEAD END IN NORVELT its own proper post, always discussing it in tandem with other books, and then it went on to take the Medal, so I wonder if history isn’t repeating itself here . . . To my mind, DEAD END may have been the funniest book of the year, it may have been the best historical fiction of the year (Scott O’Dell Award), and yes, even the most distinguished contribution to American literature for children, but–and this is a big but–I felt that as a mystery it left a lot to be desired.  No Edgar nomination for DEAD END.  What a delightful surprise, then, that this sequel takes up the one unsatisfying element of the previous book and makes us reconsider the first book in an entirely new light!  What else I loved: the episodic plot of DEAD END gives way to the road trip in NORVELT; the historical trivia is complemented by a running joke about comic books that provides a perfect cover for numerous literary allusions; and it’s shorter than the first one.  It’s safe to say that I liked this one even better than the first book, but I worry that what makes it brilliant is the very thing that’s so difficult to bring to the Newbery table: how it forces you to revisit and reinterpret the events of the first book.