We Closed the Comments. Here’s Why. | Editor’s Note

The comments section enables readers to provide feedback and engage in conversation. In this case, we’ve far exceeded the standard function of comments on a news story.

The comments section represents an important opportunity for readers to provide feedback and engage in conversation, and we want to facilitate interaction to the best of our ability. In this case, we’ve far exceeded the standard function of comments on a news story. While we have been monitoring these posts, using our best judgment as to what violates our policy, the point has come for this particular stream to close.

The forum is no longer conducive to civil conversation. As to the requests for specific action by SLJ, it is beyond our ability to confirm the veracity of comments, including the identity of the individual in question. Even if this effort were within our purview, we simply cannot confirm with absolute certainty that this poster is the same person.

While folks are postulating on Twitter that our "web guy" could sleuth this out with ease—and believe me, we’ve asked him and much more—we can't be sure.

En route from Denver and ALA Midwinter on Monday, I made the call to cease comments temporarily, as at least one flamer was both violating our comments policy and shifting the conversation, and SLJ editors were in transit or covering the YMA Awards, and not otherwise prepared to handle the situation. Frankly, we were overwhelmed.

Shutting down the boards in such a case is standard journalistic practice. But at the behest of the community, we reopened the section, which had become the locus for important discussion and a safe place to report personal experiences, sometimes anonymously. And it is our instinct as editors to provide this type of forum. By and large, we’ve seen the online conversation right itself after drifting off course.

But at this point, leaving it open feels like a disservice to everyone involved. I can tell you that an SLJ reporter is following up with another story, and we’ll continue to track the issue of harassment in the industry. As we have done in past coverage, SLJ seeks to provide honest and fair reporting and we will faithfully pursue the journalistic process toward this end, for our readers.

This is unprecedented terrain, and not just for our publication. Needless to say, the nature of the comments—and on a month-old post—presented a complex situation. With assistance from Andrew Seaman, Ethics Committee chairman for the Society of Professional Journalists, and Josh Moore, Ethics & Excellence in Journalism Legal Fellow for the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, the editors of SLJ are confident in our decision.

While comments are closed, we’re still here to answer questions. If you have tips or comments, you can reach out to us directly at slj@mediasourceinc.com.

Comments will remain open on other stories and posts.  

Comment Policy:
  • Be respectful, and do not attack the author, people mentioned in the article, or other commenters. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  • Don't use obscene, profane, or vulgar language.
  • Stay on point. Comments that stray from the topic at hand may be deleted.
  • Comments may be republished in print, online, or other forms of media.
  • If you see something objectionable, please let us know. Once a comment has been flagged, a staff member will investigate.


Several male writers have been very harmed by the load of anonymous accusations. But I'm glad you bring up celebrities. The women who accused everyone from Bill Clinton to the Hollywood moguls did it in public. Many have pointed this out. So why are 98% or more of the allegations on this forum anonymous? They're afraid of Sherman Alexie? Like he is going to destroy them or something? This whole thing makes me sick and ashamed. I see the "be respectful" policy on the sexual accusation forum isn't taken seriously. People are even yelling shut up at anyone who disagrees with the anonymous accusations. Is this respectful? Where was a moderator?

Posted : Apr 11, 2018 01:11

Robyn Campbell

From an SCBWI member. I wish you would have left the comments open. There is a great benefit to hashing these things out and it brings great relief to women to be allowed to lift their voices. Just because we write for children doesn't mean we are immune to the ugly side of life.

Posted : Feb 19, 2018 09:48


I am sure that Jay Asher's lawyers and the lawyers of any other men who found their reputations destroyed, careers ruined and livelihood's taken away based on anonymous internet comments on a blog post will help you out.

Posted : Feb 18, 2018 04:54


Yeah, Woody Allen and Casey Affleck seem to be suffering horribly from their accusations. Not to mention the predator-in-chief. Oh, wait.....

Posted : Feb 21, 2018 01:34

Anonymous it is


Posted : Feb 17, 2018 06:08

Tez Miller

I won't pretend I'm not disappointed. Finally, people had somewhere they could share their experiences - and that they weren't alone; they were believed and supported. And it resulted in real change, with two agents and one publisher dropping two authors. But the troll comments were left up too long, which encouraged others to join in and gaslight the brave people sharing their experiences. People defended the alleged, rather than supporting the allegers. And now where do people have to turn to confess with the safety of anonymity? (People who've shared on Twitter under their real names have been gaslighted and trolled.) If anyone wants to open a space for people to come forward, I'll volunteer to moderate.

Posted : Feb 17, 2018 10:37

View More Comments



We are currently offering this content for free. Sign up now to activate your personal profile, where you can save articles for future viewing