Libraries, Schools Join In - School Library Journal
Log In to your Account                Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe to SLJ Magazine


ADVERTISEMENT
You will be redirected to your destination in a few seconds.

Articles

Editorial | Advocacy Is Work, and It Works: As Senator Jack Reed has shown us, persistence pays

E-Mail This Link


Enter recipient's e-mail:


Close
Email
RSS |

By Rebecca T. Miller

February 1, 2012

slj2012_Rmiller_editorial(Original Import)Signing the White House’s online petition pushing for school library funding in the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act wasn’t easy for me. Not because I didn’t want to sign it, but because I couldn’t—technically, that is. The handsome petition interface kept stalling, and my login from a past effort didn’t seem to register. I wasn’t alone, however. Colleagues on Facebook and Twitter fumed and encouraged others to try again. It shouldn’t be that hard, I thought; how many signatures will be lost to frustration? That got me thinking about what some around here call the A-word: advocacy.

Right about then, a draft of Debra Lau Whelan’s interview with Senator Jack Reed (D-RI) landed on my chair (see “He’s Got Your Back”). Reed’s win for school libraries this past December provided those working in all types of libraries a wisp of hope in this time of threatening cuts. The appropriation is not, Reed tells Whelan, “the silver bullet…. But it sends the signal that the federal government is still in the game.”

In short, it’s real money but it’s also real leverage for the local fight for funding that has to keep happening in every community. It’s a top-down tool in the day-in and day-out work of illustrating the value that libraries provide.

Advocacy is work, but it’s also storytelling—something those who work with kids are particularly good at.

Last summer, I sat in on a panel that the Urban Libraries Council put together about how to influence political leaders, with actual politicians speaking (see “The Kinds of Stories About Libraries That Influence Political Leaders”). The stories that matter, they agreed, make a meaningful connection to the goals of community leaders, show how libraries have an impact, and provide, wherever possible, data on how libraries enrich people’s lives. (This line of thought was also explored by a group of library directors at Library Journal’s 2011 Directors’ Summit in December. See “Moving from Outputs to Outcomes.”)

The politicians also urged librarians to get stakeholders, like community leaders and pols, inside their libraries to see the actual work that librarians do—and the results—for themselves. Reed concurs. He describes himself as “lucky” to have been exposed to libraries his whole life, and he’s used them in every setting. Not all politicians come with such an intimate relationship to libraries. Hence, we need to build it.

Even the invitation to visit, Reed implies, is an act of advocacy. “Invite members of Congress, Senators, to your school libraries,” he says. “If you get enough of those, guess what? Lawmakers who hadn’t thought twice about libraries are going to say, ‘You know what? My constituents really think libraries are important.’”

The point is to make a connection initially with the stories we tell about library impact, and then keep reinforcing it with additional information as time passes and local needs shift.

In this sense, advocacy work is also unforgiving. It’s a cycle of actions rather than something we can strike off the to-do list. It’s also something we need to get better at integrating into our daily work. And we need to actively share what works. No single approach will do. Frankly, the do-it and do-it-again aspect of advocacy gave me a sense of relief when wwws.whitehouse.gov seemed to lock me out. If that’s all there is, I thought, we’re in big trouble.

Luckily, Reed’s $28.6 million win gave me another spurt of energy right when I needed it. I tried again, and again, and eventually signed the petition—and crowed in a tweet in my own small act of encouragement. If you haven’t signed, please consider it (but hurry, it times out on February 4)—no matter what kind of library you work in, or use. Solidifying the status of school libraries via ESEA will elevate all libraries.

Rebecca_signature(Original Import)

Rebecca T. Miller
Editor-in-Chief
rmiller@mediasourceinc.com

E-Mail This Link


Enter recipient's e-mail:


Close
Email
RSS |




Reader Comments (2)


Is that $28.6 million figure correct? Divide that by Infoplease's statistic of 98,817 public schools in the U.S. in 2010, and it works out to $289.42 per school. I appreciate the support, and it would be lovely to get a couple hundred bucks for the library next year, but that will buy about half a database subscription or one quarter of an encyclopedia set.



Posted by Julie Dahlhauser on January 27, 2012 07:29:20AM

Previous | Next

Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, or antisocial behavior such as "spamming", "trolling", or any other inappropriate material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our terms of use. You are fully responsible for the content you post. All comments must comply with the Terms and Conditions of this site and by submitting comments you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Your name: *

Your email address: * (We won't publish this.)



* = Required information

 
Advertisement

SLJ Reviews Database

SLJ Reviews Center

Latest Stories


From the Blogs


Advertisements




Connect with SLJ


Follow on Twitter






About Us | Advertising Information | Submissions | Site Map | Contact Us | For Reviewers | RSS | Subscriptions
©2011 Media Source, Inc., All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc.