Google+

November 27, 2014

Subscribe to SLJ

Text Sets: Your Chance to Lead the Common Core | Consider the Source

post it 212x300 Text Sets: Your Chance to Lead the Common Core | Consider the SourceA few days before I flew off to meet publishers and wholesalers at the Educational Book and Media Association (EBMA) conference last month, I received an email that changed what I ended up speaking about. As I mentioned in my last column, I was invited there to talk about Common Core. I spoke to the group a few years earlier on the aims and structure of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS). Now they wanted to hear how implementation was going–with a particular eye toward what they needed to know about making and selling books “aligned with the standards.”

Then I heard from Meredith and David Liben of Student Achievement Partners (SAP). The project they had described to me some weeks earlier was moving ahead. That ambitious project is what I needed to describe to EBMA–and want to share with you today.

By now, we can all recite the shifts in the Common Core English Language Arts standards, starting with “reading content-rich nonfiction that builds knowledge.” But what exactly are those “content-rich” materials that “build knowledge?” How do we find them? How do we match, arrange, and juxtapose texts so students do not merely read more of the same from each text, but, rather, discover that what they have learned opens a door to another source, which leads to another? What materials not only build knowledge but increase text complexity in such neat steps that it is not difficult for all students to get started, and by the end of an investigation nearly everyone is reading appropriately challenging works?

Professor Mary Ann Cappiello has many examples of these text sets on her blog, The Classroom Bookshelf (and its archives), and along with co-author Erika Dawes, describes the use and creation of such collections in Teaching with Text Sets (Shell Education, 2012). Unfortunately, though, no team of authors can read everything nor will every librarian and teacher in the country seek out their wisdom.

With SAP, the Libens have combed the websites of the 50 states and unearthed the 50 most common subjects that make it into the K-12 curriculum. Their next step is gathering groups of qualified experts such as school librarians to craft text sets to match the subjects. The sets must meet several requirements: the materials must be available in a format (such as articles from databases) or at a price (entire books) that make sense for a whole class.

I was eager to tell EBMA about this because price is a stumbling block. Here is a real you-go-first problem. The librarians can’t select books that will be too expensive to use. The publishers don’t want to publish paperback or digital editions unless they are sure they will get the classroom sales. We need a better channel of information; if a team is seriously considering a book they must have a clear and rapid way of reaching a publisher to make sure the book will be available in a format and at a price suited to classroom use. EBMA was the perfect place to seek ways to create that channel. But what will a SAP text set look like?

Typically they would include a complex anchor text that maps out the topic and a sequence of shorter texts that grow in complexity while offering new and distinct information. The great news is that these particular text sets would not be required or mandated. They would simply be examples–selected by qualified readers and vetted by a second level of professionals–that demonstrate how texts can be arrayed to build knowledge and create a reading ladder. If a teacher understands the concept, but prefers his or her own text selections, that’s fine. If a librarian knows, or already has access to, other resources that fit into the set, great. The goal is not to tell educators what texts to use; the goal is to demonstrate what can be found and how those materials complement each other. In other words, text sets are precisely what a good librarian already knows how to assemble.

By crafting models on key subjects SAP is getting the ball rolling, offering excellent resources for educators who prefer one-stop shopping, while opening the door to motivated librarians and teachers to work together to create their own customized sets.

I love this idea, but I can only be a kindly uncle to the process. Since I write and edit books, I can’t be anywhere near the selection–nor can anyone on the publishing landscape. All I can do is spread the word to anyone who will listen. I’ll update you as the project develops and pass along any information I find on how to get involved. The great news is that this project calls upon and highlights the skills of school librarians, making you visible at the heart of the Common Core.

Marc Aronson About Marc Aronson

Marc Aronson is a Rutgers University lecturer in the School of Communication and Information and the author of many notable nonfiction titles for children and young adults including, The Skull in the Rock, winner of the 2013 Subaru Prize from the American Association for the Advancement of Science. His book The Griffin and the Scientist (with Adrienne Mayor) will be published in April 2014. He was the first recipient of the Robert F. Sibert medal from the American Library Association for excellence in nonfiction writing for youth.

Share

Comments

  1. Myra Zarnowski says:

    I am glad to hear that SAP is taking this issue of text sets seriously. Both cost of materials and knowledge of good materials are highly significant factors. When we combine excellent teaching materials and good teaching practices, then it all clicks! Yet teachers are telling me that they don’t have the needed materials. Mary Ann and Ericka’s book TEACHING WITH TEXT SETS is a great place to start. But we need much more. I am very happy to see this effort moving ahead.

  2. Curious about SAP after reading your article, I went to their site and took a look at a few lessons on topics I know well. I was not impressed. My thoughts here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/monica-edinger/some-questions-about-some_b_4754677.html

Comment Policy:
  1. Be respectful, and do not attack the author or other commenters. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  2. Don't use obscene, profane, or vulgar language.
  3. Stay on point. Comments that stray from the topic at hand may be deleted.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through (though some comments with links to multiple URLs are held for spam-check moderation by the system). If you see something objectionable, please let us know. Once a comment has been flagged, a staff member will investigate.

We accept clean XHTML in comments, but don't overdo it and please limit the number of links submitted in your comment. For more info, see the full Terms of Use.

Speak Your Mind

*