<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Question of Text Complexity: Reader and task trump traditional measures &#124; On Common Core</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slj.com/2012/10/opinion/on-common-core/the-question-of-text-complexity-reader-and-task-trump-traditional-measures-on-common-core/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slj.com/2012/10/opinion/on-common-core/the-question-of-text-complexity-reader-and-task-trump-traditional-measures-on-common-core/</link>
	<description>The world&#039;s largest reviewer of books, multimedia, and technology for children and teens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2013 00:20:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah Hoover</title>
		<link>http://www.slj.com/2012/10/opinion/on-common-core/the-question-of-text-complexity-reader-and-task-trump-traditional-measures-on-common-core/#comment-29544</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Hoover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 18:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slj.com/?p=15834#comment-29544</guid>
		<description>The text complexity article provided a great way for me to explain (prove) to teachers that research projects with me in the library aren&#039;t more work for them, but create opportunities to for them to work within diverse reading levels yet use the task to differentiate the complexity and rigor. By using a research process that gives students a reliable foundation to work off of so that they are able tap into prior knowledge, be inquiry based and delve into deeper knowledge to create a new level of knowledge and even more powerful application. I know this because I require all projects to end with a student self-evaluation in which they reflect on the level of the process they are comfort with, nont confortable with and why for both AND for product - grade themselves using the same grading mode the teacher will use and to justify why they expect the grade they gave themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The text complexity article provided a great way for me to explain (prove) to teachers that research projects with me in the library aren&#8217;t more work for them, but create opportunities to for them to work within diverse reading levels yet use the task to differentiate the complexity and rigor. By using a research process that gives students a reliable foundation to work off of so that they are able tap into prior knowledge, be inquiry based and delve into deeper knowledge to create a new level of knowledge and even more powerful application. I know this because I require all projects to end with a student self-evaluation in which they reflect on the level of the process they are comfort with, nont confortable with and why for both AND for product &#8211; grade themselves using the same grading mode the teacher will use and to justify why they expect the grade they gave themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 387/468 objects using apc

 Served from: slj.com @ 2013-09-18 21:25:22 by W3 Total Cache --