Google+

April 15, 2014

Subscribe to SLJ

New COPPA Proposals Raise Privacy Concerns

New rules proposed by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) designed to protect minors in the digital age are leaving some concerned that its intentions could do more hacoppa New COPPA Proposals Raise Privacy Concernsrm than good.

The government agency hopes to strengthen the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) by including social networking sites, apps, and other platforms that weren’t around when the act originally passed in 1998. That law requires parental approval for kids under the age of 13 if they want to use sites aimed at children. Facebook and other sites can avoid complying with the law by opting to ban minors altogether.

But new rules, first proposed in August, seek to require that sites with “a disproportionately large percentage of children” —whether they’re aimed at children or not—also be required to follow COPPA. It also proposes that app developers, whose codes are used on sites aimed at children, also comply with COPPA’s rules. This could include sites like YouTube and Wikipedia, which, while not expressly aimed at children, often are used by them. Collecting information from those who use such high-trafficked sites could create privacy concerns that deter users from these sites rather than protect young users.

“We commend the FTC for trying to keep up with web technology, smartphones and apps,” says Deborah Caldwell-Stone, deputy director for the American Library Association’s (ALA) Office for Intellectual Freedom. “But what we’re concerned about is the First Amendment, and verifying age and identification might mount barriers to freely access information on the Internet.”

Since COPPA is aimed at commercial sites, it doesn’t impact public or school libraries. (Although, the ALA does suggest librarians understand the law so they can explain it to parents and children). However, the ALA is monitoring developments of the proposed rules and did sign on with the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT) and added comments to the proposed rules last month.

“Both of these proposals are too vague to give operators and developers a clear understanding of their obligation under the law and would create significant burdens on free expression and innovation,” write the two groups.

To Anne Collier, the problem also involves privacy and data control. With parents having to submit information in order to open additional sites, more data is collected on minors, thus creating more opportunities for the data to be used or potentially taken.

“You have that data spread in more places,” says the co-director of ConnectSafely.org. “If you require parents’ permission at every layer in the food chain, you have more data and more storage—and that makes people’s information more vulnerable.”

The FTC closed the public comment period on September 10, with the commission aiming for a final vote by the end of this fall.

Lauren Barack About Lauren Barack

Lauren Barack writes about the connection between media and education, business and technology, and is the recipient of the Loeb Award for online journalism. She can be found at www.laurenbarack.com.

Share

Comments

  1. Brittany Staszak says:

    When it comes to protecting children on the internet, I absolutely understand the desire to take steps to stop predators, keep content age-appropriate, and otherwise create a safe environment for children to play and learn. However, it is also my opinion that it should not be the duty of website or app creators and developers to create these child-friendly atmospheres as not only does it infringe on their First Amendment rights, but it would vastly inhibit the free-flow of information available on the web. Not only this, but as has been seen with so many other internet-aimed legislation, it is difficult if not impossible for legislatures to create a law using language that is not too vague to adequately follow or so strict it is, again, unable to be followed within the existing internet. It is the job of parents, teachers, librarians, etc. to monitor children and young adult’s internet use and, even more importantly, to educate them on potential threats and dangers on the internet so they can be avoided.

    • Facebook’s option (and this includes other companies like them) to comply with COPPA by “banning” minors shows their danger to society and their lack of concern for children. There is no way they can “ban” anyone because they cannot verify anything, because they have no way of knowing who is sitting at the keyboard or handling the mobile device.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] But, it made me pause and reflect when I read this article from the School Library Journal, http://www.slj.com/2012/10/legislation/new-coppa-proposals-raise-privacy-concerns/#_, about the proposed amendments to COPPA, Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act. They [...]

  2. [...] realize tougher standards for COPPA could create new privacy issues, but you haven’t even attempted to play by the ‘old rules’ much less any new [...]